Evaluation from participants
Evaluation from Participants CCAFAF
Here we will try to represent all the results from the evaluation
General Status
In the Camp there were 19 males and 51 females
Age:
Less than 20: 48 participants
From 20 to 30: 15 participants
more than 30: 7 participants
Part A: Food and Restaurant of the Camp.
HS: Highly Satisfied, S: Satisfied, N: Neutral, U: Unsatisfied, HU: Highly Unsatisfied |
||||||
Within your recent stay in the Camp please rate your overall satisfaction with: |
HS |
S |
N |
U |
HU |
MEAN |
Quality of Food |
58 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,17 |
Taste Of Food |
58 |
11 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1,19 |
Freshness of Food |
63 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,10 |
Temperature of Food |
62 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1,13 |
Portion size |
61 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,13 |
Quality of ingredients |
52 |
15 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1,30 |
Cooking of the food |
64 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1,09 |
Service from the kitchen |
64 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1,13 |
As we can see from the results all the participants were satisfied to highly satisfy from the food in the camp during the whole week. The Camp and our organisation make the best for the quality of the food. We have to thank Limassol Parents Association for the whole organisation of the food in the Camp. Many thanks to our chef John for the whole preparation and for being so kind to all participants, he tried his best and he done all the appropriate for all the participants. We can see a characteristic graph about the answers of the participants which is dealing with food.
Hospitality and Facilities of the Camp.
HS: Highly Satisfied, S: Satisfied, N: Neutral, U: Unsatisfied, HU: Highly Unsatisfied |
|||||||
Within your recent stay in the Camp please rate your overall satisfaction with: |
HS |
S |
N |
U |
HU |
MEAN |
|
Accommodation in the Camp |
40 |
23 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
1,56 |
|
Place that you were sleeping |
36 |
21 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
1,71 |
|
Electricity options in the Camp |
26 |
21 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
2,07 |
|
Wifi in the Camp |
12 |
24 |
13 |
12 |
3 |
2,40 |
|
Restaurant |
53 |
12 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1,29 |
|
Working places in the Camp |
44 |
21 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
1,47 |
|
Cleanliness inside of restaurant |
56 |
13 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1,23 |
|
Cleanliness of the Camp |
46 |
17 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1,50 |
|
Safety in the Camp |
44 |
18 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
1,50 |
|
Any problems with your visit? No problem report from any participants, just 2 participants tell us about the problems with wifi in the Camp. |
As we can see from the above graphs all the participants were satisfied with their accommodation. One or maybe 2 different answers is physical to an exchange of 70 people. The camp was the perfect place. One small problem we had with internet connection last days of our stay in the camp but also we can see that the mean even in this case is closer to satisfied. The graph of the answers of participants about internet connection it follows).
Part C: Learning Activities
C1: Global Warming: Reality or Fake, Calculate your Carbon Footprint (Monday all day)
In this part the participants evaluated the activities that are being during the Youth Exchange. First part is for Global Warming and the main presenter was Mr George Zittis (youth leader from Cyprus, climatologist). The results for these activities are showed in the following tables
Please state the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements, where 1 is strongly Agree and 5 is strongly Disagree (tick one per statement).
ABOUT THE PRESENTER
Q1. |
SA |
|
|
|
SD |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
MEAN |
The presenter communicated the information clearly. |
38 |
27 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
1,54 |
The presenter made the subject matter compelling. |
42 |
24 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1,47 |
The presented was able to answer questions. |
52 |
16 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1,29 |
ABOUT THE PRESENTATION
Q2. |
SA |
|
|
|
SD |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
MEAN |
The workshop was relevant to me. |
42 |
21 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
1,54 |
The workshop was interesting. |
35 |
25 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
1,67 |
The workshop met my purpose in attending. |
31 |
29 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
1,71 |
The workshop motivated me to take action. |
33 |
24 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
1,76 |
I want to tell others about what was presented. |
41 |
19 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
1,57 |
The handouts/supporting material were useful. |
43 |
17 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
1,56 |
I have the confidence to use the knowledge gained from the workshop in my life. |
35 |
25 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
1,67 |
ABOUT THE WORKSHOP IN GENERAL
Q3. |
SA |
|
|
|
SD |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
MEAN |
The venue was conveniently located. |
41 |
23 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
1,50 |
The duration of the workshop was right for me. |
34 |
22 |
13 |
1 |
0 |
1,73 |
The workshop was well organised. |
41 |
21 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
1,54 |
The working method was excellent |
32 |
29 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
1,73 |
Q.4. What was the best aspect of the workshop? We had the following answers from participants
- Multiculture communication
- Gained information
- Finding arguments
- Seeing the opposite point of view
- Mixing with participants with other countries and working as a team
- Knowledge gained about my personal practices and how i can become more eco friendly
- Creativity
- Interesting facts
- Participants had the opportunity to take a position that they made not agree with
- Communication and team work
- Getting to be in multinational team
- The videos
- Realised the impact you have on the environment and the ways you could change it
- The availability to help
- The team work was really nice
- The data the technical details provided
- Short presentation because there where 70 people that was good
- The well organised presentation and information’s that they provided and also the availability of answering the questions
- Group work
- We had the chance to be more creative
- I Liked the designing of the posters the reality in groups. Carbon footprint was interesting
Q. 5 What aspect of the workshop needs improvement?
We had the following answers from participants:
- Care of the group members
- In the conclusion to make o forum of one person of each group and also the audient to be allowed to pass comments at appropriate moments
- More enclosed environment
- More organisation
- Time management
- All the participants have to be encouraged to speak, some of them never spoke
- The materials should be more organised
- If you picked a group with members between 14 and 30 you could felt the difference in their experience. In one point it is harder to worth in that way in the other point it was that you have the chance to meet with people in different ages
- The assignment wasn’t very interest
- Especially the discussion about reality or Fake was no sense to me. We all know its real and playing by playing the role of a petrol company just made the presentations too long
- Footprint: Some of the answers didn’t made sense i think
C2: Moja Island (Wednesday Morning) and the Web of Life (Friday Evening)
In this part the participants evaluated the activities that are being during the Youth Exchange. Second part is for Moja Island and Web of Life. The main presenter was Mrs Magdalena Szewczyk (Youth leader from Poland, biologist). The results for these activities are showed in the following tables
Please state the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements, where 1 is strongly Agree and 5 is strongly Disagree (tick one per statement).
ABOUT THE PRESENTER
Q1. |
SA |
|
|
|
SD |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
MEAN |
The presenter communicated the information clearly. |
41 |
24 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1,49 |
The presenter made the subject matter compelling. |
44 |
22 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1,43 |
The presented was able to answer questions. |
54 |
13 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1,27 |
ABOUT THE PRESENTATION
Q2. |
SA |
|
|
|
SD |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
MEAN |
The workshop was relevant to me. |
34 |
29 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
1,59 |
The workshop was interesting. |
42 |
22 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1,46 |
The workshop met my purpose in attending. |
40 |
21 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1,54 |
The workshop motivated me to take action. |
40 |
21 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
1,58 |
I want to tell others about what was presented. |
39 |
26 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1,51 |
The handouts/supporting material were useful. |
44 |
20 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1,43 |
I have the confidence to use the knowledge gained from the workshop in my life. |
43 |
22 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1,43 |
ABOUT THE WORKSHOP IN GENERAL
Q3. |
SA |
|
|
|
SD |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
MEAN |
The venue was conveniently located. |
52 |
16 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1,26 |
The duration of the workshop was right for me. |
38 |
23 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1,57 |
The workshop was well organised. |
47 |
15 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
1,45 |
The working method was excellent |
40 |
19 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
1,58 |
Q.4. What was the best aspect of the workshop?
We had the following answers from participants
- Scientific information’s
- That all the points of different renewable energy where form in a very informal way
- Understanding Moja island
- On the Moja island we had to imagine being in the centre of the future of an island
- Fun game (Moja island)
- We could analyse and questions the solution offered by different groups (Moja island)
- That we gained skills to work with the materials, communication
- Team work
- Working in a team and discussing the different options
- I learned about renewable energies in a playful way
- Not had to know many things about different resources
- I enjoyed the game. We had to work in groups and we had to figure it out the best renewable energy options
- The fact that we have to imagine and resolve the problem of a country was perfect
- It stimulated creativity, solving problems (Moja island)
- Really like this group work assignment it was catchy (Moja island)
- We had a perfect challenge and knowledge (Moja island)
- I liked Moja island more than web of life
- We really had to work the different renewable energy sources and therefore rarely had to give some thoughts. I really learn about new poms that i didn’t knew before
Q. 5 What aspect of the workshop needs improvement?
We had the following answers from participants:
- Make aged mixed groups
- An answer and weather they agree or disagree and why (conclusions) – no connection of the life style in participants answer
- Boring web of life
- The web of life exercise was a bit too chaotic for my lickings
- Web of life (was too long)
- Web of life could have been handled different at the end when cutting the strings
- Not enogh time to finish and some participants just lied back and did nothing (Moja Island)
- So boring at the end (Web of life)
- Team work
- Web of life was too long
- It was too long the discussion part
- Discussion of web of life with questions no good finishing of the game
- Web of life needed deeper discussion
- Web of life (too long, too many people, no discussion)
- Web of life couldn’t understand what was the meaning
C3: Front Page and Take a Step Forward (Friday)
In this part the participants evaluated the activities that are being during the Youth Exchange. Second part is for Front Page and Moja Island. The main presenter was Mr Nikolas Nikolaou (General Youth leader from Cyprus, Physics teacher). The results for these activities are showed in the following tables
Please state the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements, where 1 is strongly Agree and 5 is strongly Disagree (tick one per statement).
ABOUT THE PRESENTER
Q1. |
SA |
|
|
|
SD |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
MEAN |
The presenter communicated the information clearly. |
50 |
15 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
1,37 |
The presenter made the subject matter compelling. |
51 |
13 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
1,36 |
The presented was able to answer questions. |
54 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
1,31 |
ABOUT THE PRESENTATION
Q2. |
SA |
|
|
|
SD |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
MEAN |
The workshop was relevant to me. |
47 |
19 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1,41 |
The workshop was interesting. |
52 |
11 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1,40 |
The workshop met my purpose in attending. |
49 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
1,41 |
The workshop motivated me to take action. |
43 |
19 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
1,53 |
I want to tell others about what was presented. |
44 |
16 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
1,56 |
The handouts/supporting material were useful. |
44 |
20 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
1,49 |
I have the confidence to use the knowledge gained from the workshop in my life. |
46 |
20 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1,44 |
ABOUT THE WORKSHOP IN GENERAL
Q3. |
SA |
|
|
|
SD |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
MEAN |
The venue was conveniently located. |
47 |
19 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1,41 |
The duration of the workshop was right for me. |
44 |
18 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
1,56 |
The workshop was well organised. |
50 |
14 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1,43 |
The working method was excellent |
47 |
16 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1,47 |
Q.4. What was the best aspect of the workshop?
- We had the following answers from participants:
- Development of awareness
- Living in the foot of others
- It make us thing different of how we usually do
- Role playing helped me emphasised etc
- Fun
- Made me think about society’s issues where are mostly a taboo
- Motivation for more working
- Front page was fun and take a step forward made me think
- The opportunity to show your creativity and writing skills working in an international team
- Representation of the posters
- It was something new for me and i like it a lot
- It was meaning full we had a lot to think about. I also enjoyed Front Page with creativity
- Involving creativity and putting the impact of problems in our society
- Very creative activity
- It made me think that the youngsters are so independent
- I like the design of the specific thing (Front Page)
- We had the chance to be more creative (Front Page)
Q. 5 What aspect of the workshop needs improvement?
We had the following answers from participants:
- Smallest group it will be better
- Perhaps also given some actual realities and a video
- More time to think on each question and more space where to move forward (take a step forward)
- The duration of Take a Step forward (first part ok, too long discussion)
- We needed more time for working in group
- To really get into the role i would have needed more detailed information’s on the person’s life
Part D: Program of Youth Exchange.
Here you will say your satisfaction about all the activities that took place in Youth Exchange (learning activities, intercultural activities, place of activities, place of the Camp, whole organisation of Youth Exchange).
Here the participants answer and evaluate all the actions, all the activities and general all the aspects of the Youth Exchanges.
HS: Highly Satisfied, S: Satisfied, N: Neutral, U: Unsatisfied, HU: Highly Unsatisfied |
||||||
Within your recent stay in the Camp please rate your overall satisfaction with: |
HS |
S |
N |
U |
HU |
MEAN |
Activity1: Global Warming: Reality or Fake |
39 |
19 |
7 |
4 |
1 |
1,70 |
Activity 2: Calculate your Carbon Foot Print |
28 |
29 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
1,83 |
Activity 3: Organizations Group Work |
37 |
27 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
1,59 |
Activity 4: Photo Contest (walking to the Forest) |
47 |
17 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
1,41 |
Activity 5: Moja Island |
40 |
19 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
1,63 |
Activity 6: Excursion to Water Museum and to Limassol Centre |
38 |
22 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
1,64 |
Activity 7: Front Page |
45 |
19 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
1,47 |
Activity 8: Youth Pass |
36 |
20 |
10 |
4 |
0 |
1,74 |
Night Activities 1: Welcoming (Sunday) |
42 |
11 |
9 |
2 |
0 |
1,55 |
Night Activities 2: Cyprus Night (Monday) |
63 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,09 |
Night Activities 3: 1st International Night, Malta Austria and Romania (Tuesday) |
58 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1,21 |
Night Activities 4: Cinema night (Thursday) |
23 |
23 |
15 |
6 |
3 |
2,19 |
Night Activities 5: 2nd International Night, Poland, Estonia and Bulgaria (Friday) |
63 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,10 |
Places (Venues) of the Activities |
44 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,37 |
Presentation and whole time management of the Activities |
45 |
22 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1,40 |
Place of the Youth Exchange (Platres Camp) |
53 |
14 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1,30 |
Hospitality of Hosting Organisation (Saint Anthony’s High School) |
57 |
9 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1,24 |
Organisation of the Whole Youth Exchange |
60 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1,16 |
As you can see from the results all the participants were Highly satisfy with the hosting organisation, with the place, the whole organisation of CCAFAF. Also we can see that they were also highly satisfied with all night activities especially Cyprus night and International nights. The only activity were the mean number was above 2 was cinema activity that means they didn’t like it as much as they like all the others activities. 7 graphs are following with the answers of the participants in questions with high evaluation.
Which activity did you like most of all?
In this question we had a lot of answers, but the most popular activities were:
- International nights
- Photo Contest
- Front Page
- Moja island
- Take a step forward
Which activity did you like less of all?
Also In this question we had a lot of answers, but the activities that they don’t like them were:
- Cinema night
- Moja island
- Web of life
Which activity was mean full? (a lot of things that you thought and you like it)
Also In this question we had a lot of answers, but the activities that they like them more and they were more meaning full for the participants were:
- Front Page
- Moja island
Which activity was mean less? (nothing to thing and you didn’t like it)
Also In this question we had a lot of answers, but the activities that they don’t like them and they were less meaning full for the participants were:
- Cinema night
- Moja island
As we can see from the above result the most popular activity was Front Page and it was the activity with a lot of meanings. Is remarkable also that Moja island was popular to all answers that means that it was the most discussable activity of the whole organisation.